Price, quality, lead time. For decades, those three criteria defined packaging procurement. They still matter - but as of August 12, 2026, a fourth dimension has been added by law: compliance. Three overlapping EU regulations now shape which suppliers you can work with, what data you must collect, and what claims you can legally print on a box. Ignore them and you don't just face fines - you lose market access.
This guide is for procurement and category managers who buy packaging at scale. It explains what each regulation actually demands from your sourcing process, which supplier data you now need in every RFQ, and how to build a compliance-aware scorecard that protects your business without slowing down your tenders.
The Three Regulations That Changed Packaging Procurement
PPWR: The Compliance Baseline for Every Pack You Buy
The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (Regulation EU 2025/40) entered into force on 11 February 2025 and applies from 12 August 2026. It replaces the old Packaging Directive 94/62/EC with a directly applicable regulation - meaning one set of rules across all EU member states, no national transposition required.
For procurement, the most operationally significant element is the Declaration of Conformity (DoC). From 12 August 2026, no packaging may be placed on the EU market without a valid Declaration of Conformity covering compliance with Articles 5-12 of the PPWR. Those articles span substance restrictions (including a PFAS ban for food-contact packaging), recyclability, minimum recycled content for plastics, packaging minimization, and reuse obligations.
The DoC is issued by the manufacturer - but the obligation flows directly into your supplier relationships. Under PPWR Article 16, suppliers of packaging materials must provide manufacturers with the information and documentation needed to demonstrate conformity. Under Article 18, importers must verify that the manufacturer has carried out the conformity assessment and that the DoC exists before placing packaging on the market. If the packaging carries your brand name, the compliance obligation sits with you - not your supplier.
Practically: if a supplier cannot hand you a DoC, you cannot legally sell the product in the EU. That makes DoC readiness a hard go/no-go criterion in supplier qualification - not a nice-to-have.
The PPWR also introduces a phased roadmap beyond August 2026. Later requirements include digital identifiers (2027), harmonized recyclability labeling (2028), minimum recyclability grades and recycled content targets for plastics (January 1, 2030), and higher recycled content targets by 2040. Suppliers who cannot demonstrate a credible roadmap toward those milestones represent a future sourcing risk today.
EUDR: Deforestation Due Diligence on Paper and Wood Packaging
The EU Deforestation Regulation (EU 2023/1115) is primarily known for commodities like coffee and soy - but it directly touches packaging procurement wherever paper, cardboard, or wood is involved.
Under the EUDR, wood is a "relevant commodity," and derived products including paper, paperboard, and packaging articles under CN Chapter 48 can be "relevant products" subject to due diligence obligations. The key scoping question is whether the packaging is sold as a product in its own right (in scope) or used solely as protective material accompanying another product (generally out of scope). Wooden crates, pallets, and paper packaging sold independently fall in scope; secondary cardboard used purely to carry your finished goods typically does not - but the line requires case-by-case assessment.
Large operators face a December 30, 2026 deadline for submitting Due Diligence Statements (DDS); SMEs have until June 2027. A DDS must confirm that the wood-derived material is deforestation-free and legally produced, supported by geolocation data from the forest of origin - not just an FSC certificate. FSC and PEFC certifications support due diligence but do not replace it.
For procurement, this means: if you source wooden transport packaging, paper-based outer cartons sold as standalone products, or raw paper pulp for in-house converting, you need supply chain traceability data that goes upstream to the harvest site. That data must come from your suppliers.
EU Green Claims Directive (ECGT): Substantiating "Recyclable" and "Sustainable"
The EU Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (2024/825) - commonly called the Green Claims Directive or ECGT - closes the loop between what your packaging is and what you say it is. From September 27, 2026, terms like "recyclable," "eco-friendly," and "sustainable" on packaging must be scientifically substantiated and independently verified; generic claims without evidence are automatically banned.
The practical implication for procurement: the word "recyclable" on a pack is only permissible if a functioning recycling infrastructure actually exists for that specific material in the relevant market. A supplier's assurance that something can be recycled is not sufficient. You need documented evidence - a recyclability assessment tied to real collection and sorting infrastructure.
This creates a direct link between PPWR and ECGT. Your PPWR Declaration of Conformity is the evidentiary foundation for any recyclability claim. Without it, the claim is a liability.
What This Means for Your RFQ Process
Compliance requirements don't live in your legal department - they live in your supplier data. Here are the questions that must now appear in every packaging RFQ or supplier qualification questionnaire:
PPWR - DoC and Technical Documentation
- Can you provide a PPWR Declaration of Conformity (per Annex VIII, Article 39) for each packaging type?
- What is the material composition, recycled content percentage, and PFAS status of this packaging?
- What recyclability pathway applies, and under which harmonized standard?
- How will you meet the 2030 recycled content and recyclability grade targets?
EUDR - Deforestation Due Diligence (paper/wood packaging)
- Does this packaging fall under an Annex I CN code subject to EUDR?
- Can you provide geolocation data (GPS coordinates) for the forest of origin of the wood/paper fiber?
- Do you hold a current FSC or PEFC certificate, and can you provide the underlying due diligence documentation?
- Have you submitted or are you prepared to submit a Due Diligence Statement to the EU TRACES NT system?
ECGT - Green Claims Substantiation
- What environmental claims appear on this packaging, and what third-party evidence supports each one?
- Is the recyclability claim backed by a recyclability assessment under real-world collection conditions?
- Are any claims certified by an EU-approved scheme or public authority?
A supplier change that alters material composition or recycled content triggers a new PPWR packaging type — and requires a new Declaration of Conformity before you can place the updated pack on the market. Build change notification clauses into your supply contracts now.
The Supplier Data You Must Now Collect and Store
Compliance is only as good as the data behind it. The table below maps each regulation to the supplier data you need - and how long you must retain it.
| Regulation | Data Required from Supplier | Retention Period | Who Holds Liability |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPWR | Declaration of Conformity (Annex VIII), Technical Documentation (Annex VII), material composition, recycled content %, PFAS test reports (food contact) | 5 years (single-use) / 10 years (reusable) | Brand owner / importer if own-label |
| EUDR | GPS coordinates of harvest site, risk assessment, Due Diligence Statement reference, FSC/PEFC certificate | 5 years | Operator placing goods on EU market |
| ECGT | Recyclability assessment, LCA data, third-party verification certificate for each environmental claim | Duration of claim + audit window | Brand owner making the claim |
Compliance Risk Is Procurement Risk
The consequences of non-compliance are not abstract. Under PPWR, packaging without a valid DoC cannot be placed on the EU market - full stop. Under ECGT, violations can trigger fines of up to 4% of annual turnover, plus forced withdrawal of non-compliant claims. Under EUDR, non-compliant products face market access denial and potential seizure.
For procurement, this translates into three concrete risk categories:
- Supply continuity risk - a supplier who cannot produce a DoC by August 12, 2026 creates an immediate gap in your supply chain.
- Claim liability risk - if your marketing team prints "recyclable" on a pack and the supplier data doesn't support it, the legal exposure sits with your brand.
- Switching cost risk - changing a supplier mid-cycle now triggers a new conformity assessment. The cost of non-compliance-aware sourcing compounds over time.
The implication: compliance capability must be weighted in supplier selection, not just audited after contract award.
A Practical Compliance Scorecard for Packaging Sourcing
Use this interactive tool to assess where your current packaging portfolio and supplier base stand across all three regulations.
From Scorecard to Action: Four Steps for Procurement Teams
Map every active packaging type against the three regulations. Identify which packs are in scope for PPWR DoC, which paper/wood formats may trigger EUDR, and which carry environmental claims requiring ECGT substantiation. Prioritize by volume and revenue exposure.
Add DoC readiness, EUDR due diligence capability, and claim substantiation evidence as mandatory fields in all new tenders. Make DoC provision a contractual obligation — not a post-award request.
Declarations of Conformity, technical documentation, EUDR geolocation data, and ECGT evidence files must be retrievable within 10 days under PPWR market surveillance rules. Spreadsheets and shared drives will not scale across hundreds of SKUs and multiple suppliers.
Factor in the cost of non-compliance (market access loss, fines, claim withdrawal) and the cost of supplier switching (new conformity assessments) when evaluating bids. A lower unit price from a non-compliant supplier is not a saving — it is a deferred liability.
The Bottom Line
Packaging procurement has always required balancing cost, quality, and supply security. In 2026, it also requires managing a compliance portfolio that spans three interlocking EU regulations - each with its own data requirements, deadlines, and enforcement teeth.
The procurement teams that will navigate this well are not the ones who hand the problem to legal. They are the ones who build compliance criteria into their sourcing process from the first RFQ question, collect the right supplier data systematically, and treat regulatory risk as a category management discipline.
The data foundation is the hard part. Once it exists - structured, auditable, and linked to your packaging specifications - compliance becomes a competitive advantage rather than a cost center.
Discuss your PPWR, EUDR, and Green Claims compliance situation with our experts — free of charge and no obligation.
Talk to a Packaging Expert
